1.:Will there be a hub page for the comics similar to Injustice's setup which would include chapter and issue synopsis' and cover galleries?
2.: Will there be pages for the comics themselves, detailing character appearances and written synopsis' for what occurs in the chapters?
3.: Will what happens to certain characters be listed on their pages?
4.: Say characters who don't appear in the games appear in the comics? Will alternate timeline pages be made for them or depending on if their just cameo appearances then killed off how do you guys plan to handle that?
Get back to me when you can/when you feel like it/if you feel like it/whenever.
Hey Daryl, just wanted to let you know that since Johnny Cage's and Sonya's timeline pages (Original and Alternative) are locked, I can't fix the ending videos that are red-linked. All that has to be done is changing the Video part to File and they should work again. If you or another admin could take care of that I'd appreciate it. Thanks.
Daryl, where is your proof that Ashrah's ending is Non-Canonical. I already put up my proof and I don't see any discussion about it on any talk pages. What is the explanation or else this will keep on going.
What about Sub-Zero, Bo' Rai Cho, Ermac, Nightwolf and Shujinko. There endings are 100% canonical. Ashrah's ending is canonical too. See her side mission from Deception's Konquest and that'll explain everything. There are also plenty more canonical endings in the MK universe.
First of all, I suggest you don't continue edit warring Dark Jaguar or I'm locking the page. The issue is, the side mission was never confirmed to be canon in terms of storyline, for all we know it was simply done as a way of "hey, that's how she got her sword back", I also don't recall her biography for Armageddon explicitly stating she lost the sword and got it back.
I do believe also, that the MK team confirmed in an interview only parts of the endings in the games have canon elements, but themselves not completely canon.
No ending is 100% canon. Hell, none of them are. Every now and then the MK team will adapt an idea from one or two endings, but overall they're all meant to be non-canon. Just because something similar happens in the story doesn't make the ending canon.
Sure, but this is just really new to me and the only thing that I completely understand that in Ashrah's Armageddon Bio, it states that after she was freed from the Netherrealm and she was transported to the heavens and was instructed to kill the vampire people. I guess that the side-mission could've been just a place holder storyline.
As you mentioned, I only keep one main image on the top.
In addition, I add several feature of Cryomancer, such as the cold air surrounding them.
I change the section title "Cryromancer" into "Characteristic" because it is what the section about and the former is the same as the page title. (Or we can just remove the title of this section to continue the contents from page introduction)
Maybe I add some category which was removed by admin, but that is not necessary means every edit of mine is USELESS. I myself is also an admin in other places, I would never revert every edit by a certain user (I often checking them) since and I only press "revert button" when it is clearly vandalising since revert button is sometime considered rude.
Making [[Redirect]] into [[NoRedirect|Redirect]] is not completely unnecessary. It is quiet usually on a Wikipedia-system-based site.
I don't know if you misunderstood me or some shit but I never said all of your edits are "useless". reverting your unnecessary edits isn't rude, reverting in general isn't rude. if your edit adds nothing of value, I'm going to revert it since it's a waste, that's all there is to it.
your edits regarding the Brotherhood of Shadow, however, ARE useless. there is no use in changing it if it'll link to the exact same thing.
if you redo it again (after I've already told you not to) then we might have a problem.
also please stop accusing me of undoing every edit you've made, I've only undone the ones that aren't productive, so there's really no reason to get upset about it.
Okay, I understand. But is it necessary to redo all the edit which is not so productive? I redo some of them because you said free to add back. Apparently we have some different view on it but now I won't to redo them.