look, riley, i'm sorry for posting irellevent staff and yesterday i said k: so maybe you thought that k is for 'k i don't care' but it was ectualy k for 'k i won't do it again'. so i just wanted you to know i respect your policis and the ban wasn't really neccecery.
Dirtbag Daryl wrote: saying just "k" to a rather informative warning is nothing but disrespectful. if it was an accident, as you say it is, then it will be fine. just don't do things like that in the future.
No it's not a 'major inconvenience', it's only one because you're making it one. btw, no need to be so condescending in anyway, that little tidbit of 'just saying' really gives off a bad vibe, so er...if ya could lose that, it'd be ace.
It's also funny you bring up such a minor issue which you seem quite defensive of as well doesn't really argue well
Can I please ask why you keep reverting my edits to TriBorg's brutality description? My way of writing it is in-universe, and writing out-of-universe (I.E. describing the player as "you") is frowned upon in every other wikia I've been on, and I've seen it been frowned upon here.
why did you undo my edit to Bi-Han's page, techniclly it is trivia either way, i saw what you did with the others, you had no good reason to change them, if you do, explain, for one thing that kabal thing counts as trivia yaknow, in armageddon that shinnok is a clone, and in the final battle it could still be a clone, so we dont really know what might have even happened to shinnok if during the battle of armageddon it was indeed a clone,
No it doesn't, Kabal's face is easily seen during the game in any event, it's not exclusive to the prologue. Only Shinnok's ending, (which is non-canon) states it to be a clone, even if it is a clone, Shao Kahn more or less conquers every realm, he wouldn't leave such a loose end at the risk of overthrowing him.
Mentions aren't really noteworthy in all way unless it contributes to the plot of a game, which we've got on Bi-Han's alternate timeline page.