I wanted to know why my post abou Tanya was continuously removed. Granted I know that it possibly wasn't the entire story but I figured it was enough to be modified by others and I thought it was a notable piece of trivia for her. I just wanted you to know that I wasn't doing it maliciously and had no idea you were an admin. For that I'm sorry.
Thanks, Daryl. I'm using a tablet so I will keep this short, I didn't really see much use of it until I'd seen we had other placeholder relared stuff on pages, I'd honestly forgot I'd even banned you, but I'd only banned you becauae you were edit warring. If you'd messaged me the first time after removal I'd have been more than willing to discuss. So yeah, I do apologise for the ban.
Since you're one of the few people who can edit Freddy Krueger's article, can you please remove the "About Freddy Krueger" heading? It ruins the article, and is inconsistant with all the other articles, which have a clear introduction before the index.
Fireworks888 wrote: freddy krueger? more like.....frrree-fuck you crashbash. COME ON AND SLAM, WELCOME TO THE SLAM-JAM.
THANK YA MA'AM. DID I EVER TELL YOU BOUT THE TIME ME AND MUH BUDDY KEAITH WHEN BACK IN TIME TO STOP RUDOLPH HITLER THE RED-NOSED DICTATOR (HUH HUH, "DICK") FROM TAKIN OVER THE WORLD WITH A BUNCHA JEW-MONKEY HYBRIDS. YOU'RE WELCOME (HUH HUH, "CUM) BY THE WAY.
I just recieved a message from Fireworks888 in regards to a hostile message coming from an admin in regards to me. I received it as a screen shot. Just reread the rules this wikia has and it talks about hostile messaging as being prohibited. I was wondering how to go about this? I asked this person (not Fireworks888) if this was a real post. Not trying to start a war, I'm just very disappointed about the lack professionalism coming from an enforcer of the rules. If this issue is untrue then I'll drop it altogether.
Where is the source that says that everyone was killed? Daegon and Taven were missing and as I said, Shinnok was the only one (apart of Shao Kahn) who remained alive (he sent a clone to be a support to Daegon and the gathering of the Forces of Darkness) in the Netherrealm.
Why is that Shinnok a clone? Because according to Johnny Cage's Armageddon Bio, he defeated "Shinnok" easily (and Kenshi in his bio, found that unbelievable that Johnny did a stunt like that).
And the whole Mediterranean cult was in MK9, so, he doesn't have the power to defeat Shinnok as he did in MKX.
You're expecting me to remember where I found the source, John Vogel said it or some shit. Nothing except for Shinnok's ending states it was a clone, and Shao Kahn had God like power, it states in his Armageddon ending which is now canon to the original timeline he conquered EVERY realm, why would he let Shinnok live when he could attempt to usurp him as stupid as it would be?
Can't find jack about him finding it unbelievable aside from him declining a meeting for a battle plan. Considering Shinnok was caught off guard, it's not that much of a surprise he got his ass easily kicked.
Dragon, that's some primary school logic, seriously. So just because it's said in the reboot doesn't mean it's actually part of his official backstory now in the original timeline, because it was never brought up? C'mon, that's stupid. We know he's a descendant of the cult OT and AT.